跳到主要內容

Why is there so much bullshit?

 

Frankfurt does not think that it can be attributed to the proliferation of means of communication: " Of course it is impossible to be sure that there is relatively more of it nowadays than at other times. There is more communication of all kinds in our time than ever before, but the proportion that is bullshit may not have increased."  

He writes: "Bullshit is unavoidable whenever circumstances require someone to talk without knowing what he is talking about. Thus the production of bullshit is stimulated whenever a person's obligations or opportunities to speak about some topic are more excessive than his knowledge of the facts that are relevant to that topic. This discrepancy is common in public life, where people are frequently impelled - whether by their own propensities or by the demands of others - to speak extensively about matters of which they are to some degree ignorant."

Frankfurt is not saying that bullshit is inevitable or unavoidable, otherwise, he would not have written this book to discuss bullshit.  We always have a choice not to bullshit, we can simply say "I don't know" when asked about a subject of which we have not knowledge.  What he means is that whenever someone is required or asked to say something without knowing or thinking what he is talking about, then this person produces “bullshit.”  But why some people feel compelled or obligated to do so? Frankfurt thinks that it is connected to "the widespread conviction that it is the responsibility [or right] of a citizen in a democracy to have opinions about everything."  

Is it true that “it is the responsibility [or right] of a citizen in a democracy to have opinions about everything”?   Is it possible for a person to have opinions about everything?  Before we answer these questions, we need to think about them. 

A. What does “everything” include?  An infinite number of things.  Can a human being who has limited energy and mind power to have an infinite number of opinions? Not possible.

B. What is an opinion?

Opinion: personal view--the view somebody takes about an issue, especially when it is based solely on personal judgment; a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.

An opinion is always an opinion about something. Can one have opinions about an infinite number of things?  Not possible. 

How can it be a responsibility of a citizen to do something that is impossible, namely, to have opinions about everything?  Thus, such conviction itself is bullshit. 

 

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

Re: 動漫《影宅》觀後思考

Arthur ,你的問題表明你對這個問題考慮了很多。我沒有看過這套電視動畫《 Shadows House 》,無法加以評論。但是,我可以就您的問題提供以下這些想法。   您的問題有以下幾點假設: 1. 靈魂的存在,靈魂是什麼。 2. 靈魂和身體是兩個獨立的實體。 讓我們這樣想:沒有“靈魂 " 身體就是無生命的物體; 但是沒有身體,我們怎麼知道靈魂存在呢?   在現代哲學 (modern philosophy) 之後,靈魂 / 身體問題被哲學家視為偽問題 (pseudo-problem) 。 至於約翰洛克的理論,他沒有談論本質 (essence) 而是 談論 屬性 (quality) ——物質物體的真實的或主要的屬性 (primary qualities) ——例如大小、形狀、位置、運動或靜止——這些被認為存在於物體本身中,以及次要的屬性 (secondary qualities) ——我們對它們的感知,例如顏色、觸覺、聲音、氣味和味道。這種區別與身體和靈魂之間的區別並不相同。 至於你的問題 7 :一個人的自我認同 (self-identity) ,即是我們所說的“我 " 是和我們與他人的關係分不開的。我們與生俱來具有某些特質,我們的自我認同是由他人如何看待我們和與我們的互動所塑造的。反之亦然。如果我們不思考,沒有自己的思想,我們與影子並沒有什麼不同,影子不是獨立存在的。   非常感谢你分享你的想法。 看看 Arthur 怎麼想:  【 動漫《影宅》觀後思考 】 回到 THINK      回到目錄 Categories of Posts English Version: "Some replies to Arthur’s thinking about the TV Animation Shadows House" Arthur, your questions show that you have given the issue a lot of thought. I have not watched the Animation and cannot comment on it. However, I can offer these thoughts on your questions...

漢娜鄂蘭閱讀資料

  《責任與判斷》第四章    思考與道德思量   P218-219 擷取自:  《責任與判斷》,左岸文化出版 , 2008 。 回到 哲學之語   ( 討論日期及主題 )    回到 哲學之語討論 (心得及記錄) 返回頁首  

在場與存在@存在感

  「存在感」是目前生活的流行用語,通常用來「非正面」描述某人的行為。例如,「他每天都要貼臉書或傳訊息,因為要刷存在感。」   以下僅摘錄 2021/11/27 《 哲學之語 》 群組討論 的幾句對話,有興趣的同學們可以繼續和其他朋友們聊一聊。   Helen 首先開啟話題:「在社交團體中, 大家 聊得開心,我卻感覺無法融入,那 時 就會覺得沒有存在感。」   Nanan 問:「你所謂的存在感是甚麼?」 Helen :「在群體中自卑、沒有自信。」「在朋友或團體中聊天互動,幾句之後就無話可說,覺得被冷落、沒有存在感。」   大家 想一想,當我們使用「存在感」一詞,到底是甚麼意思? 在 《 哲學之語 》 的群組討論,此一話題同樣是借用日常使用的概念及語詞,來作為我們思辨對話的練習,並非為了尋求「存在感」定義。但是我仍然查了一下   American Psychological Association 的字典說明 , 提供大家參考 。 👉 存在感 Sense of presence 1. 身處特定地點或時間段的感覺。 2. 對自己當前存在的認識。 3. 對不可見實體(如上帝、靈魂等)的親近感。 4. 在虛擬現實技術中,使用者置身於模擬環境中的感覺。 Arthur 在11/27 群組討論之後 ,用心寫下精彩的心得及回響 :  👉 我那不存在的「存在感」啊,祢究竟在哪? 另外,我有一篇「題邊話」,因討論後我正巧欣賞了《燃燒女子的畫像》(原法語片名: Portrait de la jeune fille en feu ,英語: Portrait of a Lady on Fire. )。電影中一句對白提到「存在感」(英譯   prensence ),那又是甚麼意思呢 ? 喜歡電影的同學歡迎繼續閱讀 :  👉 我愛故我在 @ 《燃燒女子的畫像》 。 (啟瑤 2021/12/13 )  回到 哲學之語   ( 討論日期及主題   )  回到 哲學之語群組討論 (心得及記錄) 返回頁首